The situation

Heading into a contentious contract cycle, a union negotiating committee wants to frame its wage demands against how department leadership pay has moved over the same years — not because the two are directly comparable, but because the contrast is part of the argument.

Step 1: Pull leadership trajectories

The committee looks up senior leadership titles in the relevant department through CompensationAtlas, which shows each individual's full pay history, including promotions and raises, since 2016.

Step 2: Line it up against the rank and file

Leadership pay in the department has grown at a noticeably faster rate over the last three years than pay for the title the union represents — a gap that's straightforward to state once both trend lines are pulled from the same source.

Context changes how a demand is heard. A number next to another number is an argument; a number alone is just a number.

Step 3: Bring it into the room

The committee presents both trends side by side, sourced to the same live public payroll data, reframing the union's ask as a question of relative growth rather than an isolated request.

Who this is for

Union negotiating and bargaining committees preparing contract proposals, and labor reporters covering a negotiation who want documented pay context on both sides.

See the CompensationAtlas product page → See custom analysis